Home > Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77 By Dr. Thomas R. Olmsted (Scholars for 9/11 (…)

Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77 By Dr. Thomas R. Olmsted (Scholars for 9/11 Truth web)

by Open-Publishing - Sunday 30 April 2006
5 comments

Attack-Terrorism USA

By Dr. Thomas R. Olmsted

April 30, 2006
Scholars for 9/11 Truth website

I am an ex Naval line officer and a psychiatrist in private practice in New Orleans, a Christian and homeschool dad. It troubled me a great deal that we rushed off to war on the flimsiest of evidence. I considered various ways to provide a smoking gun of who and why Sept 11th happened. Astute observers noticed right away that there were no Arabic sounding names on any of the flight manifests of the planes that “crashed” on that day.

A list of names on a piece of paper is not evidence, but an autopsy by a pathologist, is. I undertook by FOIA request, to obtain that autopsy list and you are invited to view it below. Guess what? Still no Arabs on the list. It is my opinion that the monsters who planned this crime made a mistake by not including Arabic names on the original list to make the ruse seem more believable.

When airline disasters occur, airlines will routinely provide a manifest list for anxious families. You may have noticed that even before Sep 11th, that airlines are pretty meticulous about getting an accurate headcount before takeoff. It seems very unlikely to me that five Arabs sneaked onto a flight with weapons.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), does a miraculous job and identified nearly all the bodies on November 16th 2001.

The AFIP suggest these numbers; 189 killed, 125 worked at the Pentagon and 64 were “passengers” on the plane. The AA list only had 56 and the list just obtained has 58. They did not explain how they were able to tell “victims” bodies from “hijacker” bodies. In fact, from the beginning NO explanation has been given for the extra five suggested in news reports except that the FBI showed us the pictures to make up the difference, and that makes it so.

Now, being the trusting sort, I figured that the government would want to quickly dispel any rumors so we could get on with the chore of kicking Osama/Saddam’s butt (weren’t these originally two different people?). It seemed simple to me... produce the names of all the bodies identified by the AFIP and compare it with the publicized list of passengers. So, I sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the AFIP and asked for an expedited response, because we were getting ready to send our boys to war on the pretext that Osama/Sadaam had done the deed. Fourteen months later, a few US soldiers dead, many Iraqi civilians pushing up daisies, and I finally get the list. Believe me that they weren’t a bit happy to give it up, and I really have no idea why they choose now to release it.

No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab; however, three ADDITIONAL people not listed by American Airline sneaked in. I have seen no explanation for these extras. I did give American the opportunity to “revise” their original list, but they have not responded. The new names are: Robert Ploger, Zandra Ploger, and Sandra Teague. The AFIP claims that the only “passenger” body that they were not able to identify is the toddler, Dana Falkenberg, whose parents and young sister are on the list of those identified.

The satanic masterminds behind this caper may be feeling pretty smug about the perfect crime, but they have left a raft of clues tying these unfortunates together. Stay tuned for part two to take a much closer look of the cast of characters on this ill-fated flight.

To see full-size images of autopsy lists and FOIA request please visit: http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02....

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified. The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address to the original CRG article must be indicated. The author’s copyright note must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

http://www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global Research’s News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

© Copyright Thomas R. Olmsted, Scholars for 9/11 Truth website, 2006

The url address of this article is: http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintA...

© Copyright 2005 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005

Forum posts

  • How could there be rag head names on it when it was are fuckin government that did it. It’s time to load up with weapons my freind.

  • The list is not signed!! Anyone who has been responsibility for acceptance of an inspection or specific information would laugh at this list.

    Also, how can you do an autopsy on ashes? How can you do a DNA analysis on ashes? Even if you could, where is the proof of the location from which the remains were taken?

    • You must be blind Harry.

      Do you not see the signature of Bonnie S. Short on the first page? The list is signed.

    • Whoops sorry, I didn’t mean harry, I mean the guy who said the list isn’t signed.

  • *Sigh*. It’s very easy to find a list of the *victims* of Flight 77, on the internet. If you check out such a list, you will see that the list you were provided with matches the list of victims at, say, www.legacy.com. In other words, your FOIA request did not yield a list of "everybody who ended up on a morgue slab", nor even everybody who died on flight 77, but only the innocent victims, specifically excluding the terrorists. Even if there was a cover up, the list you got is just a list, and proves nothing. I could put in an FOIA request that specified that I wanted the names of everybody that died at the Pentagon that day, victims and terrorists, and all they need do would be to look up the terrorist names on wikipedia, type up the list that included them.

    What you should have done, particularly as you are an MD, was request to see the autopsy reports themselves, all of them. And if they wouldn’t give you the autopsies due to problems with bereaved families, at least the reports would have documentation around them, identification numbers, etc.

    What you should also have done in this article, was not highlight the absence of "arabic names", as if you don’t even know who the terrorists were supposed to be - which indicates very poor research on your part - but highlight the minimalist response you got from the DoD, who only gave you a list that you could have found in five minutes from Google. It’s not the absence of terrorist names which is significant, it’s the absence of *any* genuine information provided other than the bare names of dead people. You wanted the autopsies, you wanted proof that the autopsies had taken place. You wanted indications on how the various individuals (including terrorists) were identified. But some of that information is not going to be available by mail order or sitting at a keyboard. You’re a scientist, do some real research!

    Silas Maxfield. London, England.