ROVE INDICTMENT IMMINENT ?

Is Karl Rove about to get the hee-ho ? http://www.democrats.com/node/8634 Will he FINNALLY BE INDICTED ?... If indicted , will he prosecuted about trivial matters ? ......... Will the disclosure of of Plame’s CIA identity ever be linked to the real damage incurred to the national security of these United States ?........ I don’t personally give a fig if Rove gave squirrelly testimony to Pat Fitzgerald........... I do care if these leaks lead to the rolling up of a CIA proprietary tracking WMD , Brewster-Jenning and Associates..........Any investigation that doesn’t broach that heretofore unmentionable subject is an execercise in trivial pursuit......... Infantile lefties see "Plamegate" through the prism of (D) v (R)......... Let’s humiliate Bush , send Rove and Libby to the Big House...... Then our crooks, phonies and charlatons will rule the roost on Capitol Hill......... Then 2 years from now , if the country is in complete shambles, Hillary Bolton-Clinton , progressive war -bitch, will ascend to the monarchial throne set in place by fellow Illuminist , King George the 1st.......... I’ve been through enough election cycles to realise real Patriots don’t hang on to letter fetishes... They don’t put much stock in the power of celebrity - and they never believe the hokum delivered to them by the mainstream media......... The fact is that dear Fitz has been extremely negligent in his duty as Special Counsel in the so called CIA Leak Scandal.......... As John Dean noted in an open letter sent to Fitz in late 2005 (Law.com) , the Special Counsel had the power and the obligation to ask President Bush to revoke the security clearances of those subjects of his investigation who had mishandled classified documents........ A refusal by Bush to safeguard our national security would have lead , in turn , to a move by Fitzgerald to petition the CIVIL court of jurisdiction to have those security clearances yanked - at once........... In the Plame Case , Fitzgerald was invested with the plenary authority of the United States Attorney General........ He had the power to move........ The imperative of securing the national security of the United States demanded that he move..... Yet he didn’t move.......... The potential damage to the United States incurred by this failure to act could be enourmous .........