Home > Tucker Carlson Visibly Shaken, Attemps to Keep Prof Jones from Presenting (…)

Tucker Carlson Visibly Shaken, Attemps to Keep Prof Jones from Presenting WTC7 Evidence

by Open-Publishing - Thursday 17 November 2005
11 comments

Attack-Terrorism USA

Today I had a chance to see Tucker Carlson attempt to grill BYU Physics
Professor Dr. Steven Jones. Carlson implied that the Professor was
aiding evil terrorists in the Middle East. He never gave the professor more
than 10 seconds without interrupting him.

Professor Jones is to be commended, though, because he made the key
point that buildling 7 wasn’t hit by an airplane and that molten steel was
found in the basements of all three buildings weeks later, when only massive
amounts of thermite explosives can cause this effect.

The good news is that the controlled press is on the defensive more and
more and is being forced to respond to the alternative media that, in
many cases, rivals government-controlled organs or propaganda, and in some
cases is now eclipsing them.

I have never seen Tucker Carson so upset. He looked like a scared
little boy. His body language screamed inner conflict. You can tell that he
knows that it’s true and that he fought with his producers to even be able to
get Jones on, and that he was supposed to attack Jones. But, whereas in
the past, many of the people he attacked he disagreed with, with Jones
he feels like Judas.

The only thing that even neared an effective attack on Carlson’s part was his line about how a fuel oil tank under Building 7 made it collapse. The problem with this 4-year-old conspiracy theory is that FEMA has long since retracted it and now says they don’t know why Buildling 7 fell.

Don’t forget the Madrid building. It burned for over 36 hours, over 70
percent of its floors had 100-ft white-hot flames shooting towards the
sky, yet none of its major supports even bent. Metal desks in the
center of the Madrid inferno, while blackened, were still useable.

Click here for the Video
http://www.infowars.com/articles/se...

Click here for the WTC7 Collapse Video that Tucker refused to show
http://wtc7.net/videos.html

Does this look like a collapse caused by a Diesel tank as Tucker said,
or a controlled demolition?

Forum posts

  • Although I believe WTC 7 was indeed deliberately brought down, Professor Jones did not impress me. In fact, his presentation on Tucker’s show looked halting and amateurish. He should have known that he was only going to have a few minutes to present his case and instead of flopping around the issue he should have gone right for the jugular. Why didn’t he begin with Larry Silverstein’s "pull it" comment and proceed from there? That statement seems like a show stopper to me. Jones should have dwelled on an interpretation of that statement and, then, introduced the video of the building actually collapsing on itself. Instead, his all-over-the-place and disorganized presentation left me disappointed and annoyed. We don’t need "expert" commentary of this caliber. And, Jones’ all too obvious embarrassed demeanor didn’t help either.

    • Dear Poster, it is difficult enough to uncover what happened with the WTC. On top of that it is hard to write a scholarly article and get it published in a peer reviewed journal. The basic modus operandi is: keep questioning everything, so that what holds up under constant attack is valid. Presenting the result of such epic battles of the mind to a unwilling uninformed audience is a whole different activity and only the lucky few researcher is able to make a decent presentation to even his own peers. Cheers to Prof. Jones!

    • Jones should have kept his approach as simple as possible in order to reach the "uninformed audience." I’m sure his confusing remarks about thermite must have left most of them cold. In my opinion he should have spoken about the building’s owner talking about "pulling it" in conjunction with the actual footage of the building going down just like a controlled demolition. That is the kind of thing that would have struck a more responsive chord in the viewers’ minds. Also, the fact hat Jones got exposure on such a mainstream venue as Tucker’s show is not in itself an achievement if the result of such exposure puts him in a bad light. In this case, unlike the Hollywood credo, "bad" publicity is not better than no publicity. Fortunately, however, Carlson’s show gets poor ratings.

    • There is a diffrence, of course, as the previous posters allude to, in an academic researcher’s presentation and a talking head.

      It is not fair to cast Prof Jones in a bad light. Tucker clearly is an air-head and was frightened that prof. Jones’ data may present a data point that fell out of his narrow field of what is the 911 reality.

      It did not help matters any when the broadcaster was not going to show the video clip of what prof. Jones had sent to them. Prof. Jones, asked that it be show and Tucker appeared as though he was wetting his pants and effectively derailed the topic.

      I wish I were Tucker Carlson, life would be so much easier without a brain.

  • I agree... let’s keep the questions flying about ALL the inconsistencies of 9/11! Until the public is made aware that their Gov’t was implicit in this/these attacks they will NEVER understand how truely criminal and immoral this Administration is!!

  • I agree that Prof Jones delivery was a bit halting but first we must remember that he is not a professional TV personality. I’m not sure if he knew he would have 4-5 minutes tops to present his theory and that also during that time he would have to answer questions from the host. I admire Carlson for giving him the time to be heard but I just wish that Prof Jones had been a little better prepared for the TV talk show format. I really would like to hear more of what he has to say about the WTC collapse.

    • Tucker Carlson born fortunate son ,kind of like Bush, heir to the Swanson frozen food fortune. His remarks don’t surpise me he and his fellow elite scum are part of the cover-up of 911.

  • The drive of the rockefellers and their allies is to create a one world government combining supercapitalism (fascism) and comunism, all under their control. Do I mean conspiracy? YES I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent." congressman Larry Mcdonald , 1976, killed when KAL 007 boeing 747 was shot down by commie Russian airforce in 1983. (stalked by USAF AWACS)
    David Rockefeller: "All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the new world order" David Rockefeller multi trillionare, chairman Chase Manhattan Bank."

  • Tucker Carlson even allowing Professor Jones on mainstream TV was remarkable in itself. Either Tucker had no idea what Professor Jones was discussing or he did know, and let him on anyway. How did this get past the censors? Maybe Tucker is a closet revolutionary. Something rather peculiar about this. Prof. Jones only appearance is on a right wing show?

    • Right on, Alex! Keep up the pressure. We all know 9-11 was a complete scam. 2/3rds of the federal government officials, top administrators and military people should be under arrest.

      Our country, NOT THIERS!

    • The fact that Marvin Bu$h’$ "security" company had total access to the buildings prior to the implosion seals the deal for me....if this is not suspicious, then I do not know of any thing tht is.....