Home > Barbarians at the Gates: The sad fate of two armies.
Barbarians at the Gates: The sad fate of two armies.
by Open-Publishing - Monday 5 March 20075 comments
Wars and conflicts Governments USA
Once upon a time the Romans had a great and powerful Army. Just as with our own (US) history, they were formed from volunteers from a wide slice of society; men with real skills and dedication. Unlike our own military, the Romans had plenty of fighters from the elite class (naturally they had better armor!), but there were many similarities too. For instance, the average Roman foot soldier had to carry 66 pounds worth of equipment on his back...almost the exact weight average of the U.S. G.I. today.
Over the centuries the Roman Army, just as ours, became more sophisticated, developed better weapons and learned superior tactics with which to engage the enemy (meaning, whoever challenged Romes’ authority).
Eventually, just as with our military, the Romans had to conscript warriors, and terms of service were expanded from the previous 6 years to 20 or more! The wealthy became more interested in other forms of income, and Romans had to look elsewhere for recruits.
So they took in many citizens (and later non citizens) from a variety of conquered countries; Spain, Persia, Germany,etc.
Just as a reminder, the military fighting currently in Iraq is composed of approx.20% NON U.S.citizens! And that’s not all. We are now accepting those with sub normal IQs, with past gang related activities and even some felons fresh out of prison!
The "bloodlines" were broken in ancient Rome, and are in our OUR military as well.
By the fifth century A.D.Germans were in command of most of the Roman legions, and eventually this led, through weakness and apathy...to the very defeat of Rome itself. The Romans had at one time the capacity to stave off the "Barbarian Hoards"...Berserkers, Vandals,Russians,etc. but eventually were overrun by the then equivelant of "insurgents", using raw energy and inventive tactics to overwhelm the softer Roman legions.
It would seem to me that we, the United States Military, face the same kind of energized and imaginative enemy today...and that WE are the "New Romans", who fail to realize or understand the anger and the furor of those who confront us daily.
The famous mystery writer, Raymond Chandler, said in an essay: "The little guy, if he believes he’s in the right...and keeps on coming..will defeat the big guy every time"
Let’s hope he was mistaken.
Forum posts
6 March 2007, 02:45
I just have one question, you tell how bloodlines where broke in Rome by making soldiers of people from Spain, Persia etc. But America is the great melting pot we hail from all points on the globe as do are bloodlines.Maybee it isnt a question guess I just dont get the bloodline thing, I mean in terms of a nation we are so young we dont even have a good start on bloodlines let alone think of breaking them.
6 March 2007, 07:07
Sorry, bad choice of the word.
villy
6 March 2007, 03:48
What he is saying is that the "non U.S. conscripts are less apt to believe in our Cultural credo of individual freedom,and would have NO problem arresting you and your family or Shooting you if commanded by their commanding officer......
9 March 2007, 14:52
"Barbarian Hoards"...Berserkers, Vandals,Russians"
Your intentions are irreproachable, and so is the geist of your article, but you should get your historical facts and spelling straight. I suggest, in all friendliness, a tour to Wikipedia.
Qûr Tharkasdóttir
12 March 2007, 01:20
The intentions of the Romans were to rule over their conquested lands, The United States conquers a nation, sets up some adaptable form of Democracy, and leaves the country to its own allegeance.....
JAB