Home > 26 days left before war with Iran

26 days left before war with Iran

by Open-Publishing - Thursday 12 May 2005
17 comments

Wars and conflicts International USA

Are we going to stand idly by as more sovereign countries are attacked? This farce has nothing to do with getting rid of nuclear weapons in the Middle East or else the US would shut down the billions of dollars of aid that Israel receives. Money that is funneled into its massive chemical, biological and nuclear arsenal, which is turning Israel into a dominant superpower. Their military & political might remains unchecked. They are in firm control of the world’s remaining superpower, the United States, and it’s massive military force. Ariel Sharon is ordering the United States around like a drunken man abusing his wife. And like a typical abused wife, the United States refuses to acknowledge it. The transparency of the situation is obvious, how long are we going to let it continue?

Mr. Sharon and company may be biting off a bit more than they can chew if he attacks Iran though. Russia and Iran have a mutual defense agreement and it has been reported that Russia has SS-N-22 "Sunburn" missiles stationed in Iran that could turn Tel Aviv into glass should they attack.

Recently there have been large troop redeployments (see articles below) out of Iraq in preparation of an attack on Iran. Stateside nurses are being sent to ’field hospitals’ too. Look for the attack to happen around June 6, 2005.

The reason Mossad has been killing off the microbiologist scientists could be that they are planning a false flag operation to wage a biological attack on the United States after Iran is attacked (most likely by Israel initially). They don’t want anyone around that would be smart enough to see through their plan and trace the strains back to Israel. They did the same thing after Mossad attacked the WTC on 9/11 when the zionist Dr. Philip Zack sent Anthrax letters. This would increase hatred of Iran and justify the upcoming draft and all out war to increase Israel’s borders. Written Feb.6, 2005

Man Pleads Guilty to Ricin Possession PDF Tuesday, May 03, 2005 [Ekberg could be one cell in a network to create a bio-terrorist attack in June. It might go like this: First Israel strikes Iran’s nuclear facilities. Then Mossad agents remote control airplanes and stage a spectacular Ricin attack in Florida, blaming Iran of course. Mossad agents on the ground plant ricin to maximize effect. Dubya immediately starts the draft and off we go to more wars for Israel. -ed.]
See also:
Israel, Iran, Mossad and a Nuclear False Flag Attack by R. Leland Lehrman PDf April 18th, 2005
Planned US-Israeli Attack on Iran PDF by Michel Chossudovsky www.globalresearch.ca 1 May 2005
Israel plans air strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites 4 May , 2005 Reporter: Mark Willacy
WHO IS SENDING YOUR CHILDREN OFF TO DIE IN WAR?
U.S. OKs bunker buster bombs for Israel By: AP on: 28.04.2005
Rumsfeld Seals The Deal On Military Bases To Launch Attack On Iran Prison Planet | April 21 2005
Insane U.S. Experimental Bomb Test, in Attempt to Change Jet Stream March 16, 2005 [See also the Secret Weapons Section ]
Iran War in June 2005
Sleepwalking to disaster in Iran By Scott Ritter 30 March 2005 - Truth to be told, there is no American military strike on the agenda; that is, until June 2005.
Nuke the Holy Land—For World Peace by Douglas Herman
War Summit - Bush, Sharon Meet To Plan Iran Attack ThermoNuclear Armed Israeli Leader To Visit Bush at Ranch Rattled CIA Types Now Sounding The Alarm About Israel MER MiddleEast.org 3-25-5
RUSSIA TO DEFEND SYRIA AND IRAN
Revealed: Israel plans strike on Iranian nuclear plant March 13, 2005
Patriot crews heading to exercise in Israel Sunday, March 13, 2005
Israel, U.S. begin military exercises eyeing Iran 3/10/2005 [Isramerica begins exercises -ed.]]
CODEX ALIMENTARIS ENDS U.S. SUPPLEMENTS IN JUNE 2005 By Dr. James Howenstine, MD. March 6, 2005
Pentagon in favor of Syrian air strikes 3/5/2005
U.S. gives Israel ?go-ahead? to strike Syria 3/2/2005
Israel’s bombing of Syria: U.S.-approved state terrorism
SCOTT RITTER SAYS U.S. PLANS JUNE ATTACK ON IRAN, ?COOKED? JAN. 30 IRAQI ELECTION RESULTS
U.S. May Give EU Till June to Coax Iran on Nukes By Louis Charbonneau | February 25, 2005 [What a coincidence. Scott Ritter says Bush has already set June to attack Iran! -ed.]
The final stroke will come this year when Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez Frias switches to the Petro-Euro Tuesday, February 22, 2005 - A good time to make the switch would be in June when Iran opens their oil exchange
Mandatory Draft Coming-Soon June 15 2005
Cheney Behind New Mideast War Drive: Return of `Clean Break’ by Jeffrey Steinberg
The US primes Israel to attack Iran and Syria By Uri Avnery 20 February 2005
US May Use Proxy To Attack Iran, Says Dr Mahathir February 16, 2005
’America would back Israel attack on Iran’ By Francis Harris in Washington 18/02/2005
Robert Fisk: Busharon has Syria in its Sights (for Israel)
Unknown plane fires missile at Iran?s nuclear reactor 2/16/2005
Syria in the Crosshairs by Justin Raimondo February 16, 2005 You didn’t think they would stop with Iraq, did you?
US Withdrawal from al-Fallujah follows withdrawal from Hit on Monday
US Secretly Pulls 25,000 Troops Out Of Iraq By Omar Al-Faris - JUS 2-7-5
Neocons Concentrate on Promoting U.S.-Iran War By Andrew I. Killgore
Voice of the White House February 6, 2005 TBR News.org ? February 6th, 2005 - The new plan is to use strategic bombing from bases in Italy.
Iran: Next Target of US Military Aggression Selected articles and essays Michel Chossudovsky, Editor
Bush’s Poodle (Tony Blair) Echoes Bush’s Neocon Line on Iran
The Coming Israeli Attack on Iran, and its Consequences: Pearl Harbor Redux by Harry Brunser
U.S.-Israel plan to strike Irans nuclear sites finalized 2/6/2005

[Articles Continued on Middle East News page]

[Note: Many of the links on this site that expose the truth are subject to targeting by those that would suppress the truth. It is an ongoing battle. No doubt there are countless people working to take down many of these stories. -ed.]

Forum posts

  • At the riskof sounding optimistic, it seems that the US, Britain, Israel and Australia have effectively been headed off at the pass, that pass being the hellhole known as Iraq. Russia (thank heavens for Vladimir Putin!) has armed Syria and Iran very well, to the extent that should either of them be attacked, the expected response would be the demolition of a couple of US aircraft carriers and parts of the fleet stationed nearby. Iran could effectively close down shipping lanes at the Straits of Hormuz, crippling the entire world economy.

    Additionally, Russia is supplying nuclear expertise and material to the Iranians and China has inked a deal to import oil. And then there’s BRIC - it stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China and is a strategic military and economic alliance between the named nations. And how about that LATAM ARAB conference of world leaders (excluding Europe, USA, Israel, Britain and others) meeting in Brazil, to the dismay of Ms. Condoleezza Rice, Bush and the rest of the morons running the US government.

    Face it, the world has noticed hat fu**ing criminals Israel, Britain, Australia and the USA are and are not going to sit around and just take it. Bush is an absolute nutcase, and his handlers are right out of Dr. Strangelove, but attacking Iran anytime soon - and the window is closing fast - is pretty much suicidal. In a way, I almost hope the lunatic tries something because it will certainly be his undoing. Yeah, sure, get another couple thousand of our kids killed for nothing. Hell, I’m over 50, so if they reinstitute a draft they can kiss my still-primo ass.

    Start doing a little reading of items in foreign papers and you’ll see that Bush’s adventurism is about over. Of course, we’ll still be in Iraq a year from now getting our asses kicked, but we’ll also be booting that dumbass back to the Lone Star State.

  • russia and Iran have no mutual defense treaty, the sunburn is a relatively short range missile not capable of hitting Israel from Iran and most sunburn varients, virtual all, are sea launched. Russia and Iran while friendly now are historic enemies and Moscow would not risk a war over Persia. A destroyed Iran would mean Russia can take Irans Caspian drilling rights. Iran’s conventional forces would last about a week against the Americans. What Iran does have is some decent SAM’s around its nuclear installations but nothing the Americans cant easily counter. Putin is keen on alligning Russian interests with the West, with the EU if not the US, he will not risk a break over Iran, or Georgia or even Ukraine because he knows he does not yet have the dollars or the forces for his government or the Russian economy to survive a direct confrontation with the US. The Russian people may like like the Bush administration but they like dollars and cents and arent going to give up their new found prosperity to help some third world tyrants hold on to power. The Russkies have no problem sucking at the tit of any crackpot dictator willing to be their client (see Saddam) but they arent going to risk their blood and gold to help some mullahs, not while their lads are dying in Chechnya at the hands of jihadi filth.

    Putin may be an opportunist but thats politics, he is also a realist. The problem with the Americans is for them a few billion dollars is nothing they dont realise that 6 billion in foreign arms sales is all that is keeping the Russian industry alive so when they attack Putin for proliferating they are really off the mark. If you would offer his firms some joint ventures HE WOULDNT BE SELLING to the likes of Syria or Iran. But thanks to acts like Jackson-Vanik and others the US market is closed to a lot of Russian firms.

    • also Iran has not aquired any major quantities of new weapons from Russia or China in a decade, the Iranian arsenal is obsolete now, especially the air force. Iran PROBABLY does not have ANY sunburns. I really hope this helps.

  • Iran’s plans for an American preventative attack is to escalate. Iran has the ability to destroy Saudi oil production, and if both Iran and Saudi oil production halt, the price of a barrel will go through the roof. Furthermore, Iran might have the ability to halt shipping through the Strait of Hurmuz. As worrysome is Iran’s ability to field a nuke, which a source of mine in the Pentagon says is estimated at 80%. Iran has been test firing missiles with a remote control detonation system, which imply intent to cause an EMP. Finally, in Iraq the CIA estimated over a 75% chance that Saddam, percieving an existencial threat to his regime, would authorize chemical and biological attacks on the US homeland. That certainly applies to Iran’s Mullahs as well, and they have Iraq as an object lesson of what happens if a regime doesn’t escalate. Too bad the Bush administration is ideological based, because only an ideologist would take the chance of initiating an optional preventative war with Iran. If Iran escalates, and particularly if N.Korea sees the second "axis of evil" member falling and acts in unison, the gates of hell will open up.

  • Wow, sound analysis on the three previous posts. Nice to see around here, for a change.

    Hopefully the mullocracy will collapse from the inside because Iranian kids want to hang out at the mall, flirt, and watch J-Lo videos. What a happy ending that would be.

  • I am aghast at the comments in the first posting. You should be ashamed of yourself if you are indeed an American. That is all I can say. I pity you and your children. By any measure, you are an’enemy within."

    • Hell yes. Way to have the guts to say it like it is.

      I didn’t react to the guy’s post because, if you spend much time here, you’ll see that treacherous fools like him are a dime a dozen on Bellaciao. I just come here to tease the animals.

    • Sure, OK, the guy (me) saying that pre-emptive strikes against a nation which poses no direct threat (Iran) is an enemy of the state and anti-American, but the posters who see war as a means to an end are patriots. OK, this is why we have debates. Try explaining the rationale for attacking Iran, when we are already mired down in Iraq. And why should we be the ultimate authority over what other nations do at all? Why should we be concerned if Iran has nukes? I would think Russia would be more concerned.

      But really, where is the threat from Iran? Some bogeyman terrorist threat? Show me some proof that Iran is either, a. planning to build nukes to attack us, b. has participated in large-scale anti western terrorism, or c. poses a threat to us in any other way.

      They do sit on top of a lot of oil though, don’t they?

      You right wingers have a lock-step mentality that sees America as the nation that can do no wrong, no matter what. The reality is that you’re too scared, too proud or too stupid to admit that Bush and his buddies have made serious mistakes. Matters on the ground in Iraq are NOT improving, our economy is stalled out, the government has been overspending for the last five years, but that’s all good with you.

      Look, fellas, I can raise the flag just as high as you, probably much higher. Being a patriot does not imply that we agree with everything our government does. It implies responsible, intelligent, rational thought and action, which is sadly missing from the right point of view.

      I’m pretty certain that my detactors on this comment section thought Vietnam was a good idea too. Face it, you just like blowing things up. Maybe if you had to go and actually do the fighting, you’d sing a different tune. Like bullies on a playground, you only know one way to settle disputes - with force - rather than reason, negotiation and intelligence. Time for you to grow up and stop acting like children, if that’s even possible.

    • Where to start? I think Vietnam was a bad idea, too, although I don’t question the motives of JFK and LBJ in getting us into their war.

      You actively hope for the death of American servicemen. You’re “optimistic” about “getting our asses kicked in Iraq.” You don’t mind getting “another couple thousand of our kids killed.” It doesn’t take a blind nationalist to have a problem with this. If you committed any act in furtherance of what you hope for, and it was witnessed by a couple of people, you could be convicted of treason. Check the Constitution. But I’m happy to leave you running loose as an example of how nasty some people are.

      Casus belli for Iran? They fund Hezbollah, which has called for the death of American citizens wherever we may be. They’ve been preaching “death to the Great Satan” (you, me, and our countrymen) for 25 years, and a lot of people have acted on their message. They are currently funding operations against our soldiers in Iraq. You can’t argue that it’s wrong for America to invade Iraq, but it’s okay for Iran to.

      “Bogeyman terrorist threat”—Did you sleep through 9-11 and two decades of terrorist attacks before that? Perhaps you missed OBL’s three declarations of war on every American taxpayer. (If you’re unemployed, maybe they’ll go easy on you.) Militant Islam is a broad, decentralized movement, but it certainly clusters around places like Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Syria. We need to do whatever is necessary to drain those swamps. Sometimes that’s war, sometimes not.

      We absolutely should be the ultimate authority over what other nations do TO US, and Iran is in the fore of the “death to America” crowd. Try reading their propaganda. After that, if you don’t take them at their word, there’s not much anyone can do for you.

      “Bush and his buddies have made serious mistakes.” This is supposed to be surprising? In which struggle have serious mistakes NOT been made?

      “Being a patriot does not imply that we agree with everything our government does.” This point is self-evident. But you’re not simply criticizing the government, you’re saying you don’t care if American soldiers die protecting your right to say that you don’t to care if they die. I say that’s pretty damned selfish of you.

      “It implies responsible, intelligent, rational thought and action, which is sadly missing from the right point of view.” No point in trying to take the high ground now. Your devil-may-care attitude regarding the deaths of “another couple thousand of our kids” may be a lot of things, but “responsible” certainly isn’t one of them.

    • You are absolutely right.... The true role of the patriot is to hold his government to account. Otherwise patriotism is truly the last refuge of the scoundrel. Wrapping yourself in the flag has nothing to do with patriotism and blind obedience to government because you seem to think that they can do no wrong is the very pinnacle of stupidity. At the moment the right wingers on this site seem only to be arguing about which tune the band should play on the Titanic. They have singularly failed to notice that the iceberg is in the oval office.

    • Where to start? I think Vietnam was a bad idea, too, although I don’t question the motives of JFK and LBJ in getting us into their war. (Were they in the pocket of Big Rice?)

      You actively hope for the death of American servicemen. You’re “optimistic” about “getting our asses kicked in Iraq.” You don’t mind getting “another couple thousand of our kids killed.” If you committed any act in furtherance of these goals, and it was witnessed by a couple of people, you could be convicted of treason. Check the Constitution. But I’m happy to leave you running loose as an example of how nasty some people are.

      Casus belli for Iran? They fund Hezbollah, which has called for the death of American citizens wherever we may be. They’ve been preaching “death to the Great Satan” (you, me, and our countrymen) for 25 years, and a lot of people have acted on their message. They are currently funding operations against our soldiers in Iraq. You can’t argue that it’s wrong for America to invade Iraq, but it’s okay for Iran to. People like you get bent out of shape when an American president calls the Iranian government "evil" every decade or so, but you’re willing to give them a complete pass on their endless "death to America" sermons.

      “Bogeyman terrorist threat”—Did you sleep through 9-11 and two decades of terrorist attacks before that? Perhaps you missed OBL’s three declarations of war on every American taxpayer. (If you’re unemployed, maybe they’ll go easy on you.) Militant Islam is a broad, decentralized movement, but it certainly clusters around places like Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Syria. We need to do whatever is necessary to drain those swamps. Somtetimes that’s war. Hopefully that won’t be necessary in Iran.

      We absolutely should be the ultimate authority over what other nations do TO US, and Iran is in the fore of the “death to America” crowd. Try reading their propaganda. After that, if you don’t take them at their word, there’s not much anyone can do for you.

      “Bush and his buddies have made serious mistakes.” This is supposed to be surprising? In which struggle have serious mistakes NOT been made?

      “Being a patriot does not imply that we agree with everything our government does.” This point is self-evident, and no one on this string has argued to the contrary. Care to tell us the sky is blue, too?

      “It implies responsible, intelligent, rational thought and action, which is sadly missing from the right point of view.” No point in trying to take the high ground now. Your devil-may-care attitude regarding the deaths of “another couple thousand of our kids” may be a lot of things, but “responsible” certainly isn’t one of them.

  • Hell Yeah!! I’m one of the proud and the few on this site, that’s for sure! There’s plenty of big game for the hunting in this preserve for us supporters of President Bush and his war on terror, isn’t there now.

    And for the above remarks about America: let me take a guess, buddy: I mean, I’m going WAAAAYYYY out on a limb here, but I’m guessing you’re a JOHN KERRY SUPPORTER, right?? You bloody fool liberals just don’t want to learn, do you? AFter 8 years of Bill Clintons’ namby pamby, limp-wristed responses to the numerous attacks against us all over the world, from WTC #1 in 1993 (which was a practice run), to Khobar Towers, to the Embassies in Africa 1998 (300 dead), and culminating with the attack on the USS Cole (sentries on the ship were NOT allowed, repeat NOT allowed to have loaded rifles, thanks to Clinton and Mad Half-bright, his Secretary of STate).
    What did Clinton do about it? Nothing. But that’s what you liberals wanted, right? Let’s talk, let’s negotiate, let’s capitulate: But where did it get us, it brought us 9/11 that’s what it brought us. Thanks to you liberals and your bloody obsession with "civil liberties" for anything that crawls, Osama Bin Laden figures, we’re soft, we’re decadent (he’s right about that), and we’re divided (also right). We won’t fight back. WRONG. We’re fighting back, and we’ll ask the questions later.

    The only way to respond is to WIPE OUT Islamic radicalism. Yes, we are going to have casualties. Yes, we are going to have deaths. But it has to be done. WE are the only country that can do it.

    The Democratic Party is too consumed with abortion on demand and euthanasia to worry about national security. You’re spending too much time passing out pamphlets on how to take your minor daughter across state lines for an abortion at the Planned Parenthood Clinics, pal. Leave the fighting to us, OK? I like living.

    • Who turned tail and ran after more than 200 Marines were killed in Beirut? That really showed the rest of the world how tough the Republicans really are/were, didn’t it! It sure as hell wasn’t a Democrat, and it sure as hell wasn’t a true American Patriot - it was a Republican Icon more important to you than Jesus Christ. Go check your Rapture Index before you regurgitate more of your tired government lines (lies), just to be sure you and Jesus really will high-five each other someday..............but don’t ever believe that that will ever happen, because Jesus was a LIBERAL, wasn’t he, Mr. Asshole! When you pull your scared little head out of your ass and breathe Freedom, for a change, you’re the type who will just stand there and fill your shorts with Hershey squirts because of all the Republican bullshit that’s been going on around you, all this time. You’re a major part of the problem. The only real solution is for you, and all others just like you, to go kill yourselves! Then Freedom will have a chance again!

    • Between your frothing and your scatological insults, you point out that Reagan bailed on Lebanon. You’re right about that—that was the wrong thing to do. I’m still not sure why he sent troops in the first place, but leaving simply because we took losses makes no more sense there than it did in Somalia. My analysis of the past 25 years is bipartisan. I don’t think anyone treated global jihad with the seriousness it deserved.

      You’re the sports-fan partisan here, buddy, not me.

      Nice of you to call for my death, by the way. Making room for me in your re-education camp?

  • "You liberals" this and "You liberals" that.

    Seems to me like you’re the one pushing blame on the innocents and not the other way around.

    You need better arguements than mere baseless defamation.

    And NO liberals do not look forward to killing of service men, the agenda is to end killing in the best manner as possible.

    Your plan is to wipe out a whole religion?

    Sounds great, I know of a man with a tiny mustache that would applaud you.

    Good job.

    Great points.

  • No one can stop what is going to happen, the gears are already grinding away at the invevitable.

    The best we can do is sit back and hope that everything will work out well in the end, if the war, in itself, doesn’t cause the end.

  • I guess world war 3 is comming. Whomever starts the war this time is going to lose BIG TIME. Don’t let a tie and suit fooooool you.