BARACK : BEWARE MEDIA O-BASM !

Forum posts

• 4 December 2006, 16:59

  Obama is the Democratic Party’s wet dream. He’s of mixed race - white mother, black father. He’s a Muslim, although it is played down, and he’s young, attractive and smart. He’s a melting pot JFK. One can only imagine how easy it would be for his handlers to manipulate him. The bottom line is that no matter who the Dems proffer as their knight in shining armor to win the presidency in 08, that person will be no friend to the average American working man and woman, no matter what warm and fuzzy populist rhetoric comes spewing forth form his or her’s mouth.

• 4 December 2006, 20:04

  Obama is a White-Approved Oreo.

  Just like Condi, Powell (both Colin and his loser son, Mike.)

  Whites Love Obama.

  By the way, Obama was a Muslim or was never really a practicing Muslim. (His middle name is Hussien, for those who care). But he has made it a point to mention his conversion to Christianity.

  When the Whites look at him they can pretend that everthing is as beautiful as their make believe camelot. And they placate themselves by looking at this half-breed, crooked, man who is an apostate. Although, Whites will be hyporitical as usual.

  In private they will think and say that he is a half-breed. In public they will say what a wonderful place America is that such a "multi-ethnic" can live the "American Dream" (tm). That somehow, his breeding is something of some higher (spiritual?) value.

  Whites can then ignore the other Blacks who actually have integrity.

  Obama will out do the Whites on their own agenda (just like Powell and Condi) to get their approval. That is also implicitly known.

  This is a perfect match — A Black wants to be White and Whites who have a Black to do their bidding.

  I hope he runs and wins the presidency in 2008 — the man will continue Bush’s policy and will make the Whites proud.

  • 5 December 2006, 10:47

    You’re right! This "empty suit" is being shoved up our asses BECAUSE he IS, well, sorta black. Kind of like Halle Berry who never had anything to do with her black father except when he came in handy for her career. This Obama character is being used by the true racists, you know, being treated as if he were the "white man’s burden" in the words of that preeminent globalist. Winston Churchill. I so agree with the statement that he’s a worthy successor to bush as they’re cut from the same cloth.

    He’s the perfect final nail in our coffin, and since no one will be willing to speak out against him because he’s half black, we deserve him.

• 5 December 2006, 03:08

  Six years ago, when I was still a good loyal Democrat, I would have thought the article and the comments were racist. But I am no longer a good loyal Democrat. And I see Obama exactly as the writer and the commenters see him.

  • 5 December 2006, 06:42

    Yes, thanks.

    There is a difference between "race" and being "racist", which I believe you have come to understand.

    In America, we Whites always but always use race as a mitigator in all of our daily relations. How can we not, it is the first calling card. All subsequest reactions and relations are based on our first meeting. When we meet someone who is Black there are a set of assumptions that automatically come into play. Along with sets of filters. No matter who the Black person is we just met.

    Then a great deal of time and effort is spent by the Black overcoming these and gradually we distill them though the filters we present. Time and again in my entire life this has been the case. I only came to realize this after discovering "Eastern Conciousness" and learning to view and examining myself from an outer prespective. I am now able to view myself as a third person when meeting someone. And after several more years I came to be able to see and talk in these terms without fright; I can now see how our efforts of this "equality of races" over the last fifty years have been a total loss.

    Our efforts have been to deny that there exist the race barrier/filter. When it should be the first thing to be acknowledged But, we Whites, when ever we, even briefly acknowledge this, even for a moment, there is a "fright thought" that cause our subconciousness to fall into turmoil. It makes us feel very uncomfortable in the head. And later it will cause a "flashing" of rapid thoughts all relating to the meeting of a Black. Which makes us even more tormented. This is because in our subconciousness realies the imbalances that are structural to our society. (We are not a "melting pot" at all.)

    At the same time, Whites think that if they do not mention "race" in and discourse that it will go away. This is beyond being dishonest. It is being immoral. And in support of this look around you and look at what we say and do in private amongst our trusted folk versus what we say in public amongst our "untrusted" folks.

    Our subconciousness knows that the Blacks start off from a different and lower platform. Their path in life is different than ours and if should meet some successful Black (by our standards in education, wealth, enterprise, etc.) our subconciousness realizes that this human has overcome the barriers to not only attain in his life but that he has done so to our standard. To which, we ourselve may not have successfully navigated.

    Then there is the subconciousness realization of "accepting" a Black when in "uniform". And it does not matter if he is wearing an Army jacket or that of a sports player. We "accept" them. Our subconciousness accepts them through the uniform that they wear. We then attribute some other value on their property and abilities and their behaviour. (How many times homes of Black sport personalities are perviewed on television versus that of White. Think of this. Meditate on this. You too will see what I am talking about. BUT MEDITATE THE CORRECT WAY — NOT SOME "NEW AGE" LAME WAY.)

    This simply cannot be blamed on the MSM, after all, where do the personalities of MSM come from? They come from our own "White" community. They hold the same thoughts and beliefs and they tell us what we (our subconciousness) wnats to hear; because their subconciousness is like our subconciousness. Holding the same feelings and beliefs and expressing the same actions and words.

    Coupling this with an anomoly like Obama allows us to collectively and individually respond to what you see happenning with Obama.

    This is only a shallowest of analysis and description of what is going on. There are huge number of sets of feedbacks occuring between us, MSM, and the likes of Obama. Knowingly or unknowingly he and all others who are particapating in this "reality" are acting out that short and laminate understanding on what "race" is and what it means in America.

    There is much more that can be discussed. Here I’ve only attempted to summerize the most obvious of the visible points.

  • 11 December 2006, 15:36

    4.84: You have written a very thoughtful and insightful comment here, I must say.
    But I have a question that I must ask you: What do you mean ’meditate the correct way, not some New Age lame way’ ? This one statement seems to be rather uncharacteristic, even anomalous as seen in context to the rest of your very open-minded commentary. Please explain.

  • 15 December 2006, 09:26

    66/28:

    I hope you are still reading this. I had not signed in for a few days, so sorry for the delay in reponding. And in some ways, I am surprised that anyone has actually read this as it had gotten old and was crolling off the topics’ list.

    In any event, meditation is something that we all (as in all living creatures) should be doing.)

    Doing it the right way means not doing it the way that it is done in the Western society. I know of no school, group, community that teaches mediation as such as they do in the Eastern societies. Even there much of this kind of teaching is diluted and the effort and energies are disapated.

    Throughout humankinds history we have been told how and why to do this but always, it has been distorted by individuals for their gain in money, power, killing, dying and so on,

    Even now there are very few Sufis or Buddahs or Gurus (or whatever you want to call them) that can perform meditation to the level that was achieved by some over the last 1500 years.

    Meditation as taught in America is geared towards a profit. (in of itself this is not wrong, but it is the only focus). For example, there are many who take people of weekend retreats and attempt to teach the methods and then you are left on your own. Or you have to keep going back to this over and over.

    The point of mediation is an ongoing struggle for the life of the person. When I say struggle, I mean the effort — it is to be maintained over the life of the person. Each and everyone of us.

    And it must not be corrupted with the belief of "religion" (which we all are taught as part of these fake "retreats".)

    I am digressing too much here but I wanted to say a brief blurb about it... (It is way complex — Yet it is the easist thing a person does daily.)

    Let me just suggest to you to try this one thing and maybe we can stay in touch via this article for a while and I can tell you something else next in the progression.

    Before you fall asleep as you are lying down. Try to close your eyes and assess your thoughts.
    That is, watch and count all the images, thoughts you have for only a minute or two.

    Just count them and see how many you get. In the beginning there will be many and they will "flash".

    These will be all of the thoughts of the day and past. They will be of this post and so on.

    Do this each night for just two to three days.

    — -

    Post here what you count and tell me about your "falsh" thoughts and I will tell you the next thing to do.

    — -