Home > Bush Honors 9/11 by Putting Assault Weapons Back onto American Streets
Bush Honors 9/11 by Putting Assault Weapons Back onto American Streets
by Open-Publishing - Tuesday 14 September 20046 comments
Commentary September 14, 2004: Going against the wishes of 70 percent of the American public, Bush allowed - indeed encouraged - a 10-year federal ban on assault weapons to expire this week, allowing Americans and resident terrorists to purchase AK-47s and Uzis at their local gun stores. The move also coincides with the third anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on America.
In so doing, Bush effectively overturned the cornerstone of the US gun-control movement, the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban that was signed by President Bill Clinton after a series of shootings in US schools and fast food restaurants.
The move added to the mountain of evidence that Bush is out of touch with the American public, and out of touch with reality. The only thing he evidently is in touch with are his rich friends at the National Rifle Association (NRA) who are bankrolling his campaign.
As expected, John Kerry, with newfound cojones, slammed Bush for letting the ban expire. Kerry said Bush had chosen "his powerful and well-connected friends" in a secret deal with the gun lobby over the police officers and families he promised to protect.
"Ten years ago today, with the leadership of police officers all over the country, we passed a tough crime bill to protect America," the Massachusetts senator said.
"We made sure, in a tough fight, that criminals couldn’t get their hands on military assault weapons, and we put 100,000 cops into our nation’s communities where they could make an impact and stop crimes," he said.
Citing the 9/11 commission and other reports, Kerry said that al Qaeda had issued a manual that urged followers to "come to America and buy assault weapons."
Kerry also criticized Bush for proposing cuts to the Community Oriented Policing Services, or COPS, program that the senator helped pass 10 years ago. The program provides grants to state and local agencies to hire police officers. Bush proposed cutting it from $482 million to $97 million next year.
"When his powerful and well-connected friends asked for a massive tax cut, he said ’sure’ and he’s paid for it by gutting the COPS program, slashing gang prevention and cutting enforcement programs that keep drugs like meth off the streets," Reuters quoted Kerry as saying.
"Why is George Bush making the job of terrorists easier and making the job for America’s police officers harder?" he asked in a separate written statement.
Under a 10-year prohibition enacted in 1994, certain powerful military-style assault weapons were outlawed, as were high-capacity ammunition magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The law expired at 12:01 a.m. on Monday.
Sarah Brady, a gun control activist whose husband, Jim Brady, was badly wounded in the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan in 1981 said Mr Bush had shown "absolutely no leadership" on the issue, adding that allowing the ban to lapse was "purely political.”
Reuters said the expiration of the ban was a victory for the politically powerful NRA gun lobby, which had made it a top priority.
Despite the fact that opinion polls show 70 percent of Americans favor renewing the ban on assault weapons, many lawmakers were afraid to cross the NRA weeks before congressional elections, according to the article.
Forum posts
14 September 2004, 22:18
Know terrorists can now purchase assault weapons???? It they are know terrorists, why don’t we arrest them before they buy. Certainly the Brady background check will pick up that they are know terrorists? You people sicken me with your mis-information tactics. I am continually amazed at how the percentage of Americans quoted as supporting this ban increases with each "gun control" article. Last week it was 68% on AOL yet AOL’s own poll showed 49% for and 43% against retaining the ban. Far be it for anyone to actually tell the truth when it comes to this issue. It is interesting to note that recent Brady Type claims that the ban affected a drop in "Assult Weapons" traced to crime, does not mention the ATF has been ordered to lower their reported assault weapons traced to crime number due to false reports, faulty record keeping and poor investigation.
I know let’s ban cars and no one will even get killed or injured in an auto acident! How about we ban booze...oh already tried that. Well we can still sue the shit out of Coors if someone abuses this product which provides no know benefit to the human race.
14 September 2004, 23:32
In Africa it’s easier to get an AK-47 than it is to get a loaf of bread Get your facts straight. Nice try.
14 September 2004, 23:36
Exactly why would terrorists come to america to buy assault weapons for at least a $1,000 - $4,000 when they can get them in a third world country for next to nothing? This is just more nonsense from liberals who don’t have the common sense of a chicken!
30 September 2004, 17:05
I think a foreigner carrying an AK would get flagged at customs.
15 September 2004, 00:38
The repeal of the assult wepons ban in the state of Maryland has not made them one bit more avaliable as they are still a regulated fire arm in this state. The only thing it has done is allowed collectors and shoters is to buy a more accurate copy of this type of weapon. Automatic ak’s, M-16’s, Uzis still require a fedral tax stamp and check. Get it straigt before running off at the mouth.
5 October 2004, 03:27
To take away my guns you will have to pry it out of my cold dead child’s hands.....