The crisis of UAE controlled port companies derives not from their love of "ATOMIC IRAN". The crisis is the result of UAE hatred of "ATOMIC IRAN" and their long term status as Vichy -style collaborationists , vassal states of the Anglo-American imperium that are setting up this insane confrontation run by PNAC dog of War , Drunken Dick Cheney. Do you realise the money that will accrue when "ATOMIC IRAN" takes palliative measures to forestall the latest installment in the onging (…)
Home > Keywords > Environment > Nuclear
Nuclear
Articles
-
THE UAE PORTS CRISIS : THEY’RE OUR PUPPETS
22 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
2 comments -
UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells
22 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
4 commentsThe Sunday Times - Britain The Sunday Times February 19, 2006
UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells Mark Gould and Jon Ungoed-Thomas RADIATION detectors in Britain recorded a fourfold increase in uranium levels in the atmosphere after the “shock and awe” bombing campaign against Iraq, according to a report. Environmental scientists who uncovered the figures through freedom of information laws say it is evidence that depleted uranium from the shells was carried by wind (…) -
America and Iran: At the Brink of the Abyss
21 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
2 commentsWe can stop a "preemptive" nuclear strike by Jorge Hirsch
Whether the U.S. will use nuclear weapons against Iran if a military confrontation erupts is in the hands of a single person, President Bush, as stated in NSC 30 from 1948: "the decision as to the employment of atomic weapons in the event of war is to be made by the Chief Executive when he considers such decision to be required." Bush will certainly not ask Congress nor the public permission once hostilities start. Whether or not (…) -
There is no imminent threat of Iran building a nuclear weapon
20 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
5 commentsCongressman Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH), Ranking Member of the House Government Reform Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations, issued the following statement today on H. Con. Res. 341:
“This bill undermines efforts towards a peaceful resolution of Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and puts the United States on a dangerous path that could lead to war. This bill, and the debate in the House, have an eerie resemblance to similar debate and resolutions that led (…) -
Iran Is 10 Years From Nuclear Bomb-U.S. Intelligence Contrasts With Administration Statements
20 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
1 commentA major U.S. intelligence review has projected that Iran is about a decade away from manufacturing the key ingredient for a nuclear weapon, roughly doubling the previous estimate of five years, according to government sources with firsthand knowledge of the new analysis.
The carefully hedged assessments, which represent consensus among U.S. intelligence agencies, contrast with forceful public statements by the White House. Administration officials have asserted, but have not offered proof, (…) -
While USA has thousands of nuclear and DU warheads, Venezuela has none
17 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
by Mary MacElveen
Most of you will have read Would Sumate stand by and allow their fellow citizens to be contaminated? and, if you have not, I strongly urge you to do so. In this piece I wrote in great detail concerning the effects of depleted uranium and the devastating effects it has on American soldiers as well as innocent civilians.
I do not only mention Iraq, but other countries as well where this deadly weapon has been used.
As tensions rise between Venezuela and the United (…) -
’10,000 would die’ in A-plant attack on Iran
13 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
4 commentsBy Thomas Harding
A major American attack on Iran’s nuclear sites would kill up to 10,000 people and lead to war in the Middle East, a report says today.
Hundreds of scientists and technicians would be targets in the opening salvos as the attacks focused on eliminating further nuclear development, the Oxford Research Group says in Iran: Consequences of a War.
The research coincides with reports that strategists at the Pentagon are drawing up plans for "a last resort" strike if (…) -
More Evidence Nuking Iran is on Schedule
13 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
4 commentsIn a story appearing in the Sunday Telegraph, the newspaper once owned by the Canadian criminal finagler and neocon “Lord” Conrad Black, amoral strategists “at the Pentagon are drawing up plans for devastating bombing raids backed by submarine-launched ballistic missile attacks against Iran’s nuclear sites as a ‘last resort’ to block Teheran’s efforts to develop an atomic bomb.” If not so deadly serious, the idea that the Straussian neocons will shock and awe Iran only as a “last resort” (…)
-
Chavez and the good people of Venezuela have only the best of intentions for USA
12 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
2 commentsby Mary MacElveen
There are times when I read an article that borders on comedy ... where I actually sit there laughing, as well as shaking my head, knowing that an ill-informed public will actually believe it.
I first want to state to my readers around the globe and especially here within the United States, that if you think that Venezuela is a threat to you ... you really do need to get a life.
The piece I am referring to is Pentagon document mentions Venezuela as a concern and I (…) -
Stage Set For Nuclear Annihilation of All Life On Earth
12 February 2006 par (Open-Publishing)
Watch a 9 minute video with Dr. Helen Caldicott explaining what the world’s fate will be should George Bush and/or Vladimir Putin get their nuclear wires crossed and launch thousands of nuclear warheads.
With almost a dozen nukes pointed at all 250 cities in the Northern Hemisphere in every country (w/over 50,000 people each), a strike against Iran, a technical mistake, a drunken rage or even an accident could very well be the flash point which sets an irreversible nuclear, worldwide (…)