Home > Target Dick Cheney: The Sociopath Uncorked
Target Dick Cheney: The Sociopath Uncorked
by Open-Publishing - Wednesday 13 October 20044 comments
by Jeffrey Steinberg
When Sen. John Edwards mentioned the forbidden "H word"-"Halliburton"-during the Oct. 5 Vice Presidential debate, Dick Cheney’s knuckles turned white and the Vice President seethed with his now all-too-familiar sociopathological rage. While Senator Edwards failed to push Cheney’s buttons to the point that the Veep might have uncorked with a barrage of his signature "F words," in every other respect, Cheney made it clear, in words and gestures, that his cynical disregard for the truth, and his obsession with waging war against the rest of the world, has not been tempered by a spate of highly public revelations that his Iraq war, and war on terrorism have been, to date, abysmal failures, which have isolated the United States from virtually every former ally.
Cheney also remains a prime target of a string of criminal investigations, involving forged documents, corporate bribes, trading with the enemy, leaks of classified material, and widespread corruption in Iraq no-bid reconstruction contracts. All of these scandals, for the moment, remain under the public radar screen. However, should any one of them surface on the eve of the elections, Cheney’s corruption could prove to be the decisive factor that sends George W. packing on Nov. 2.
There is growing evidence that the White House spin machine has been working overtime to keep those scandals out of the public spotlight. A recently planned segment of CBS "60 Minutes," on the origins of forged Niger government documents purporting to prove that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq was seeking yellowcake uranium from that African state, was cancelled after Karl Rove and other top White House officials practically threatened to blackball CBS from access to the Administration if the network aired the story, several sources reported to EIR. According to several Congressional and intelligence community sources, an ongoing federal grand jury probe into the Niger documents has traced them to Ahmed Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress. Top Pentagon civilians, all linked to Cheney’s chief of staff Lewis Libby, have been reportedly implicated in the document hoax, along with self-professed "universal fascist" Michael Ledeen.
Sources report that the White House squeeze play on CBS has been matched by Attorney General John "Crisco Kid" Ashcroft, who has abused his powers by sabotaging several ongoing investigations into an AIPAC/Pentagon spy ring, that passed classified information on to Israel. He also has pressed for a delay in action by the independent counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, probing the source of the leak to columnist Robert Novak of the identity of an undercover CIA officer, who happened to be married to Ambassador Joseph Wilson. Wilson made a February 2002 trip to Niger, on behalf of the CIA, in which he concluded that there was no credible evidence of the purported Niger-Iraq uranium deal.
Cheney’s al-Zarqawi-Saddam Hoax
On the day of the Vice Presidential debate, Knight Ridder news service published a damning leak of a new CIA assessment-commissioned several months ago by Cheney himself-showing that there was no solid evidence linking Abu Musa al-Zarqawi, the purported top al-Qaeda operative in Iraq, to the former Saddam Hussein regime.
As Knight Ridder writers Warren Strobel, Jonathan Landay, and John Walcott wrote, "While intelligence officials cautioned that information about al-Zarqawi remains incomplete, Bush, Cheney and other top officials have publicly made al-Zarqawi the linchpin of their contention that Saddam’s Iraq had ties to al-Qaeda. Questions about whether the president and other officials overstated the intelligence about Iraq and omitted contradictory information and analysis are now at the center of the campaign debate over Iraq policy."
The same story grabbed headlines on ABC News just hours before the start of the debate. Indeed, on Oct. 4, the Daily Telegraph had run a story, based on interviews with U.S. military intelligence officials on the ground in Iraq, suggesting that much of the al-Zarqawi profile is a myth, providing the Bush Administration with a convenient villain, to blame for the out-of-control insurgency.
The leak of the Cheney-commissioned CIA report was raised specifically at the debate, but Cheney ignored the question and repeated his mantra about Saddam’s state sponsorship of terrorism, and the threat that he would have given WMD to terrorists, ad nauseum.
Other Leaks Hit Cheney’s Lies
The week before the Cheney-Edwards encounter, several other CIA documents had come to light, showing that the intelligence community had warned, in January 2003 on the eve of the Iraq invasion, of the asymmetric warfare threat the U.S. occupation would face. In July 2004, a full National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) was produced, spelling out three scenarios for Iraq, ranging from unstable peace to a fullscale civil war, painting a far more negative picture than that offered by Bush, Cheney, and other top Administration officials.
Cheney’s reaction to the July 2004 NIE leak was typical: In a fit of rage, he banned the New York Times reporter who penned the new story, from his campaign plane and Air Force II. One well-placed Washington source reported that Cheney’s bouts of rage, when confronted with unpleasant truths, have resulted in two White House briefers and one CIA briefer being fired and/or banned from the White House.
Dems Flank Halliburton
As Vice Presidential candidate John Edwards was nailing Cheney on his corrupt ties to Halliburton in the televised debate, Congressional Democrats were also pulling off a successful flanking manuever. On Oct. 4, the House Government Reform Committee held hearings on the pre-invasion oil-for-food program, which had been administered by the United Nations, and which is now under investigation for possible mismanagement and corruption. Every Democrat on the Committee showed up for the hearings, and, as the result, a resolution was passsed, extending the committee’s mandate to include a probe of the post-war reconstruction effort, run by the Bush Administration, involving the use of billions of dollars in Iraqi oil revenues, some of which went to no-bid contracts given to Halliburton.
Faced with a vote, Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.), the chairman of the national security subcommittee, acquiesced to the demands by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), the ranking Committee Democrat, and co-signed a subpoena of documents, which was delivered to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Oct. 5. The subpoena demands 12 categories of Pentagon documents on the Development Fund for Iraq expenditures, and gives Rumsfeld a deadline of Nov. 5 to comply.
Another Anonymous Exposé
In effect, the Bush Administration is confronting a full-scale revolt by professional diplomats and intelligence officers, who are sickened by the Administration’s persistent lies and policy disasters.
Cheney’s handpicked successor to CIA Director George Tenet, Porter Goss, has been sent over to Langley with one overriding mission: to plug the leaks. So far, Goss has not been exactly successful. On Oct. 3, the Washington Post revealed that Goss’s personal choice as Executive Director of the CIA, Michael Kostiw, had been forced to resign from the Agency in 1982 over shoplifting charges and for giving deceptive answers during a lie-detector test.
On Oct. 4, an anonymous senior foreign service officer, still employed at the State Department, penned a damning article for Salon magazine, warning that, if the Bush-Cheney team is re-elected, the neo-conservatives will totally take over the government, including Foggy Bottom.
"Anonymous" warned: "Secretary of State Colin Powell is not staying for a second Bush term. When he goes, the last bulwark against complete neo-conservative control of U.S. foreign policy goes with him. The implications are enormous, yet the American electorate appears to be blinded by the Bush campaign’s deliberate manipulations of 9@nl11."
The author proceeded to document the neo-con cabal inside the Pentagon and the Office of the Vice President, focussing on the role of Cheney chief of staff Lewis Libby, his chief deputy David Wurmser (formerly part of the intelligence/disinformation cell at the Pentagon), Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and ex-Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle.
"Anonymous" ended: "Powell is leaving. We need to repeat that. When this reality sinks in, we will finally understand what we are getting ourselves into in a second Bush term ... George W. Bush has signed on to the neo-con agenda with the unshakable faith of the born again."
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2004/3140cheney_sociopath.html
Forum posts
14 October 2004, 13:27
yes it is all beyond shocking that all these lies and corruptions are blatantly being allowed to happen. the worst possible thing is bush -this whole administration- getting re-elected. but a question with regard to CBS, why does the white house
– any administration- have the right to prevent news reporters or media corporations access based on what they report? as you said "blackball", how can that be legal? there should be a law preventing that, as all media should have access regardless of what they report or what their slant/bias is.
14 October 2004, 22:25
CBS could, if it had any moral conviction, report the treatment it is getting from Bushco....instead it sits silently on the sidelines and does nothing...CBS has a history of this. When the tabacco companies inside memos showed that their own sicentists reported that adding enhanced nicotine type tabacco would greatly improve the durgs ability to cause addiction and therefore insure a steady supply of nicotine addicts (customers) and tabacco companies pursued this as a policy, CBS did not air this report, it caved in to the tabacco companies because the giant conglomerate that owns CBS also owns tabacco company stocks. Their producer and investigative reporter Lowell Bergman who broke the story resigned in protest of the CBS decision not to air the report. A movie The Insider was made about this episode...so you see CBS has no integrity. If CBS wanted to do the right thing which would be to air their report before the election and help bring the truth to Americans, instead it rolled over. But think how many viewers would have been gained if they had done the moral thing which is to inform the public about the truth....so you see instead of forging new ground in reporting the truth, they decided to play it safe and not make any enemys in the brutal and corrupt government we live under.
14 October 2004, 23:02
Don’t you understand? These people are so powerful, they do whatever they WANT to do and no LAW seems able to stop them. In short, they are above the law.
20 October 2004, 09:04
I would change that statement to—until someone convinces them of the contrary they will continue to believe not that they are above the law but that they ARE the law. They can invoke, dismiss, ignore, manipulate the law any way, any time that it suits them for whatever illegality they want to perpetrate. Why? Because they have a servile, obeisant, obliging lapdog press that will ignore their anti-constitutional contortions, excuse their constant pathological lying and pass the spotlight to any flimsy canard meant to put any Democrat on the defensive and provide a diversion so that BushInc can continue their criminalities with nary a cough or noticeable hiccup.
It is sad that a once pioneering and proud nation now prefers mindless "reality" television and sound-bites fashioned after the WWF bombast instead of the investment of a thoroughly examined political discussion to determine public policy. Americans must decide—without the urging of the Four Stooge Media, the experts who long ago have blurred into prostitutes and do not forget the Legions of Scaife-financed think tanks who supply a steady stream of propaganda to steer public policy in the direction of privilege for the few. Do we want to live in the world they have envisioned for the rest of us? This well paid Army has one mission—they are determined to realize this subsitence nightmare with absolutely no consideration of equality or the misery that is self-evident in their global scheme! America, wake up or cease to exist, it is that simple.