Home > Who’s Next ?
Wars and conflicts International USA
Three capital cities have been bombed recently - Baghdad, Kabul and Belgrade - in a ten-year period, with the nations responsible, the US and UK, evincing no discernible signs of guilt. Twenty-three nations have been bombed by the US since WW2, from Japan in 1945 to Afghanistan in ’99 and recently Iraq- that’s one nation per three years. That’s fourteen percent of all UN member-states. Not one of these attacks had a shred of legality under international law, each was a criminal act. Over that same period, thrice that number of nations were forcibly intervened-upon by the US - a sequence well described in William Blum’s Rogue State. Such interventions are a hope-killing experience for the nations concerned and are propagators of retaliatory ’terrorism’ Any undue aspiration towards self-realisation by a nation-state over this period, has met with US intervention, covert or overt. That’s one-third of UN member-states!
As to why this process is happening, let’s have a quote. ’Our overriding purpose, from the beginning through to the present day, has been world domination - that is, to build and maintain the capacity to coerce everybody else on the planet: nonviolently, if possible; and violently, if necessary. But the purpose of US foreign policy of domination is not just to make the rest of the world jump through hoops; the purpose is to facilitate our exploitation of resources.’ (Ramsay Clark, formerly US Attorney General) Nations of the world have had to view their precious resources as mere tributaries that flow towards America .
Three years ago the Bush administration issued its blueprint for global domination and ceaseless military intervention, entitled ’The National Security Strategy of the United States’ (Sept. 2002), assigning to America the right to attack any nation, any time, any where, with any weapons system it chose, unencumbered by international treaties. The NPT, CTBT, BWC and Landmine Convention have all been thrown out by the Bush administration, along with the ICC and Khyoto Treaty on Global Warming. America’s bellicose new unilateralism is radically opposed to the seeking of multilateral accords, for which the UN exists .
The US, and to a lesser extent Britain and Israel, have been voting massively against UN resolutions on peace and disarmament for the past thirty years .Can this really continue? The UN needs to be composed of nations which agree with its Charter, namely that ’Member States shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, and that they undertake to ’settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered’. We are fortunate that such fine words have been composed and signed up to, by most nations of the world, and we only need now to affirm that their literal meaning be adhered to, by member states.
Article 51 of the UN Charter grants the right to inherent or collective self-defence only if an armed attack occurs against a member of the UN. The two (and only two!) conditions spelt out by the Charter are, firstly that force may only be used after an armed attack, and secondly only until the Security Council takes the necessary action. ’Pre-emptive self-defence’ is a violation of the Charter and nothing else .
America comprises only 4% of the world’s population, and we should avoid believing that it is somehow indispensable, or all-powerful. The League of Nations was the first incarnation of a world government, and was deemed to be inadequate because it excluded America. Let us now affirm, that the UN needs to be composed solely of nations that do actually believe in the UN Charter . A World government, if it is to inspire the peoples of the world with hope, must be seen for example to oppose CIA infiltration of nations whose governments have not requested them; and as taking steps towards the removal of US military bases, from countries where a majority of the populace does not desire them; and as opposing plans to bomb further nations by America.
Let’s make, at the start of a new millennium, the affirmation that civilised nations on earth are those which share together a sacred concept, the immunity of non-combatant civilians - i.e., those which are not prepared to threaten women and children in warfare. As weapons systems grow more deadly, it becomes more essential that a nascent world government should affirm this issue as central, as in fact crucial for the continuation of civilized life. This would tend to imply that the nuclear powers be excluded from the holding of privileged positions, these being weapons-systems that cannot in the nature of things make such a distinction.
At Nuremburg, no-one prosecuted city bombers, because both sides had been doing it. Like some horrific mental virus, the US/UK have been continuing doing this, and we all know the wretched reason why: troops too timid to engage with a military enemy, fly above anti-aircraft range where the only targets visible are civilian. There now exists an international criminal court (ICC), and in the course of time the UN will no doubt insist that such practices fall within its remit. On October 10th 2001 a full Afghani mosque was bombed, during prayers. Some hours later, while the bodies were being pulled out, it was re-bombed (8). Is there much point in the UN continuing while such deliberate targeting of civilians takes place, by its most powerful member?
In the long-term, I suggest that a reformed UN should request that US military power, at present the largest known in planet earth’s recorded history, be transmuted into an endeavour to reach Mars, and that the US be entrusted with maintaining StarPeace, a non-militarised outer space. This may seem absurd, like putting a shark in charge of the swimming pool, but I merely offer it by way of conjecture. Its army should be in charge of clearing up the landmines, there being presently one per sixty inhabitants of Earth now in place, more from the US than anywhere else. A new United Nations would want to insist that the USA must go for some decent period, say ten years, without once bombing another nation, with not a single illicit intervention to alter a foreign government, before it can again be readmitted to the community of civilized nations, by re-joining the UN. America needs to be expelled from the UN until such time as it is prepared to submit to the rule of international law, as would be signalled by its readiness to accept the jurisdiction of the ICC.
We emerge into the new millennium where a new world government is the only hope for the rescuing of humanity. Now the time has come for the ’axis of evil’ US/UK to be sundered and for a different stage in history to begin.
Coming soon to a country near you...
Nations bombed by the US since WW2
Japan 1945
China 1945, 50
Korea 1950
Guatemala 1954, 1960,
Indonesia 1958
Cuba 1959
Vietnam 1961
Congo 1964
Laos 1964
Peru 1965
Cambodia 1969
Lebanon 1983
Grenada 1983
Libya 1986
El Salvador 1980s
Nicaragua 1980s
Panama 1989
Iraq 1991-2005
Somalia 1993
Bosnia 1995
Sudan 1998
Former Jugoslavia 1999
Afghanistan 2001
Forum posts
26 April 2005, 15:58
You are already in the New World Order/UN, they call the shots. I’d suggest you study what "your" god the UN suggest to do about the world population.
Don’t read press releases, but true documents. The US has been fighting rogue wars for a 100 years now, beautiful plan. Make the country completely bankrurpt and reliant on a saviour (NWO). America tried to start this long ago, they faked a bombing that sent them into Vietnam, they tried to set up a scene to make it look like Cuba attacked us (JFK wouldn’t allow it), we allowed Pearl Harbor, we allowed 911, etc.
The NWO wants the citizens of all countries to cry injustice and to come running to them for help. Educate yourself. CFR and other organzations control the US, learn and understand.
26 April 2005, 20:16
"It is easy to understand the mental stimuli in two alley cats squabbling over a scrap of food, but it would be a mistake to attribute as simple a state of mind to a terrorist planting a bomb in an airport." In other words, you must raise your level of thinking/awareness to a higher level in order to see the truth.
War is an effective tool for political and social control over a large population. It can be used to keep a people divided as well. If a people are divided they are less likely to realize the truth. Conflicts and turmoil cover earth’s history like a rash. But very few even realize who started these wars and for what purpose simply because they are not looking at the world from the proper perspective.
27 April 2005, 02:27
Plus you have to remember the U.S. is bankrupt.
Propping the economy up are Asian, and European banks, because if they don’t
dollars worth 10 cents are not going to look good to their shareholders.
U.S. News and World Report, editor Mortimer Zuckerman, no liberal by any stretch.
Because of government obfuscation, most Americans don’t realize the deep hole we’re in and the fact that we’re still busy digging."
Zuckerman and others have quoted grim figures to illustrate the recklessness of administration spending. The government’s obligations, current liabilities and unfunded commitments are more than $43 trillion and rising.
"That’s trillions, with 12 zeroes — 43,000,000,000,000," Zuckerman reminds.
As the Government Accountability Office suggests, the estimated net worth of all American families is about $47 trillion, and 90 percent of that would be required to cover current obligations.
#
#
#
That includes all of Bill Gates’ money folks.
27 April 2005, 02:27
Plus you have to remember the U.S. is bankrupt.
Propping the economy up are Asian, and European banks, because if they don’t
dollars worth 10 cents are not going to look good to their shareholders.
U.S. News and World Report, editor Mortimer Zuckerman, no liberal by any stretch.
Because of government obfuscation, most Americans don’t realize the deep hole we’re in and the fact that we’re still busy digging."
Zuckerman and others have quoted grim figures to illustrate the recklessness of administration spending. The government’s obligations, current liabilities and unfunded commitments are more than $43 trillion and rising.
"That’s trillions, with 12 zeroes — 43,000,000,000,000," Zuckerman reminds.
As the Government Accountability Office suggests, the estimated net worth of all American families is about $47 trillion, and 90 percent of that would be required to cover current obligations.
#
#
#
That includes all of Bill Gates’ money folks.
27 April 2005, 02:43
Yes it is time for the rest of the world to boycott the United States. Expulsion from the U.N. would be a good place to start. The U.N. should move to Switzerland where they have not had a war in 400 years. If the U.S. is isolated and no other nation will supply it or trade with it this could be the new beginning for hope for the people of this country gaining back control of their out of control warmongering for profit government. Israel also, and the world would be a more peaceful place as long as all of the other nuclear states keep their weapons pointed dirctly at us to keep us in line.
27 April 2005, 05:35
Ask yourself, why do most of the "world" legislators have in their motto somewhere "order out of chaos".The Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) was created in 1979 under Presidential Memorandum 32 authored for President Carter by Prof. Samuel P. Huntington, a Harvard professor and former FEMA Advisory Board chairman. Huntington wrote the
"Seminal Peace for the Trilateral Commission" in the mid 70’s, in which he criticized democracy and economic development as outdated ideas. As co-author of the book, "Crisis in Democracy"
the professor said:
"We have come to recognize that there are potential desirable limits to economic growth. There are also potentially desirable limits to the indefinite extension of political democracy. A government which lacks authority will have little ability short of cataclysmic crisis to impose on its people the sacrifices which may be necessary"
ps FEMA is aligned with the UN as are other "police" orgs in the world
27 April 2005, 08:48
Helen Back
Well done. I say this as a 26 year CIA veteran counter intelligence officer writing my own books for the Dark Operative Series. I would like to connect with you and determine if there are some serious areas for mutual collaboration. I even have a yahoo conference LOCT on the Yahoo groups. The LOCT stands for Leutrell Osborne Counter Terrorist.
You have touched on a theme covered by a true political scientists. What is even more interesting if you track the internal methods the United States uses to conduct foreign policy. Remember many of these bombing started out as Covert Action operations emanating from Presidential Directives given to CIA as "secret" assisgnments allegedly to determine and stall the eventual war. Now take that secret stuff and look at what this administration does today. There are fewer secret and clandestine directives just pure Bush and his team saying my way or the highway. I have coined the term "Overt Action" instead of Covert Action to describe current US policy.
One more point. Remember baby Bush has the exprience of his father Daddy Bush as well as the teams of people who both of them have developed over the years. The teams are excellent at what they do.
Keep up the good work. Leutrell Osborne (301) 858 8455. Do a google on my first name "Leutrell."
30 April 2005, 10:30
Actually China and Russia have more than the US, they beat them hands down in technology, education, and arms, etc...but I digress.
The New World Order Plan (UN)does envision that America will burn like the Phoenix Bird, that Egyptian mythical bird, who dies voluntarily and bursts into such horrific flame that her body is reduced to ashes. Our occult Founding Fathers were told by their demonic Guiding Spirits that our true national bird was the legendary Phoenix Bird (very true check it yourself and all the symbols, it’s not parania, but very real). At the right time, our nation is to burn like the Phoenix, and out of our ashes will arise the New World Order, with Antichrist on the world scene.
The technology exist that’s not nuclear to make it happen, research scalar and such.
UN does nothing to help people, look behind all those pretty clippings to see how many have died at their hands in "peace" keeping, as someone else pointed out. Have you ever read their policies for population control, land to be set aside (most of US, big chunks of Europe, etc)?
1 May 2005, 07:33
The UN can not act because the US blocks every action that goes against our imperialist agenda. Without the US the UN could be much more effective. They might even be able to organize the rest of the world into a peaceful and cooperative place for the other inhabitants of the earth. As long the the corrupt US is a member with such power, the UN is like an old man without any viagra.