Home > Carter: US Presence Fuels Attacks

Carter: US Presence Fuels Attacks

by Open-Publishing - Friday 24 September 2004
1 comment

Former US President Jimmy Carter said Tuesday said bloodshed in Iraq
"would be tremendously reduced" if Iraqis knew U.S. troops were not
there to stay.

Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Former President Jimmy Carter said Tuesday he hopes the United States
will withdraw its troops from Iraq next year, if Iraqis are able to
govern themselves by then.

Carter said bloodshed in the country "would be tremendously reduced" if
Iraqis knew U.S. troops were not there to stay.

The former president, answering written questions at a Carter Center
forum, said the perception among Iraqis of a long-term U.S. military
presence is the main reason the violence continues.

He also said elections planned for Iraq next year could help reduce
tensions there. Those elections, he said, may not be as problem-free as
most U.S. elections but generally would be fair.

"There is a ghost of a chance for democracy," Carter said.

He reiterated his belief that the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq was an
unnecessary and "horrible war" that was based on a "deliberate"
misinterpretation of intelligence. Saddam Hussein, while "a horrible
man," did not threaten U.S. security, he said.

Carter, who has visited about 120 countries over the years, said he’s
never seen opinions of the United States as low as they are now.

"It’s hard to find a country that looks to the U.S. with admiration," he
said.

Turning to domestic politics, Carter discussed the bitter controversy
over Sen. John Kerry’s military service in the Vietnam War. Those who
"refused to go" into the military during the Vietnam era are quick to
question Kerry’s service, he said.

"He’s stigmatized as someone who’s not worthy to defend our country," he
said.

Asked about the race, Carter bemoaned the abundance of negative
television ads and a culture in which he said big companies and
special-interest groups give money to candidates with the expectation of
later rewards.

And Carter decried the loss of civility in the campaign.

When he ran for president in 1976 and for re-election in 1980, Carter
said, he and his Republican opponents generally addressed each other as
"my distinguished opponent."

He cited the 2002 U.S. Senate campaign in Georgia, when Saxby Chambliss,
who won, attacked incumbent Max Cleland for opposing a homeland security
bill. A Chambliss TV ad, Carter said, depicted Cleland with Osama bin
Laden and Saddam Hussein.

Carter took particular exception to Chambliss’ criticism of Cleland ---
a Vietnam veteran who lost three limbs in that war --- saying Chambliss
had never served in the military.

The sad, thing, Carter said, is how effective such negative campaigns
are. "The best way to win an election is to totally destroy the
character of your opponent."

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/0904/22carter.html

Forum posts

  • "Their either with us or against us" Bush at the start of the Iraq war. As it turns out most of the civilized world is against us.

    Our administration in its arrogance does not care about world opinion and they have made that quite clear. However many of America’s citizens feel otherwise. Many of us care deeply to belong to the world community and to work on solutions to the world’s problems as one. When will we adopt the idea that the world and its resources belongs to everyone and learn to like that idea?

    It is tragic that the leadership of this country is more interested in corporate wealth than they are in evolving humanity toward non violent solutions to global problems. The future generations will pay the price for this greed and the resources to solve problems will be squandered on destruction of peoples and their cultures in the quest to world domination.

    It is hard to comprehend that in this day and age we can not find peaceful solutions to share this beautiful planet. God is Dead.