Home > Most U.S. troops in Iraq support withdrawal, poll finds
Most U.S. troops in Iraq support withdrawal, poll finds
by Open-Publishing - Thursday 2 March 20062 comments
Wars and conflicts International USA
WASHINGTON - Nearly three out of four American troops serving in Iraq think U.S. forces should withdraw within a year, and more than one in four say the United States should leave immediately, according to a new poll published Tuesday.
The poll, conducted by Zogby International and the Center for Peace and Global Studies at Le Moyne College in Syracuse, N.Y., was a rare effort to determine the views of American troops serving in a ground war.
Twenty-nine percent of the troops surveyed said U.S. forces should leave Iraq immediately, another 22 percent said they should leave within the next six months and 21 percent said within six to 12 months. Twenty-three percent agreed with President Bush’s call for troops to stay "as long as they are needed" and 5 percent were unsure.
David Segal, a military sociologist at the University of Maryland, said that while most service members were more conservative than society as a whole, it wasn’t surprising to see them reflect attitudes similar to civilians, who increasingly oppose the war.
Those views aren’t necessarily an indication that troops are losing faith in the war, Segal said.
"One could argue that troops are saying, `Hey, we’ve accomplished a great deal. It’s time to get out,’ which is what you hear a lot of people in Washington saying," he said.
According to Zogby International, the survey consisted of 944 military respondents who were interviewed face to face at several locations throughout Iraq from Jan. 18 through Feb. 14. The names of those interviewed and where they were interviewed weren’t disclosed. The margin of error was plus or minus 3.3 percentage points.
The survey was conducted without the Pentagon’s permission, and some military officials privately questioned its validity, since troops in a combat zone are likely to express negative views of their situation.
"The poll’s findings certainly aren’t reflective of the attitudes we see displayed by the majority of troops, who are performing in a remarkable manner in a combat situation far from home," said Lt. Col. Barry Venable, a Pentagon spokesman.
American soldiers in Iraq, in interviews with Knight Ridder, frequently have expressed discontent with the situation there. They’ve cited too few soldiers to control the insurgency, a lack of equipment and pessimism about the success of the mission.
Other main findings from the survey:
_85 percent of those surveyed believed that the war was "to retaliate for Saddam’s role in the 9-11 attacks," although the 9-11 commission in 2004 found "no credible evidence" that Iraq had cooperated with al-Qaida in the attacks.
_68 percent believed that the real reason for the war was to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
_58 percent said the current mission was clear, and 42 percent said it was unclear.
_About 2 in 5 saw the Iraqi insurgency as mostly homegrown, with very little foreign involvement.
_53 percent said the United States should double the number of troops and bombing missions to control the insurgency.
_55 percent opposed using harsh interrogation methods on prisoners.
_43 percent said their armor and equipment were adequate.
While 89 percent of Army reservists and 82 percent of National Guardsmen said the United States should leave Iraq within a year, 70 percent of regular Army troops thought that American forces should withdraw within that time frame.
Of regular soldiers who said that, nearly 28 percent thought American forces should leave immediately.
A little more than 25 percent of regular Army troops said U.S. forces should stay as long as necessary.
Forty-nine percent of Marines said the United States should leave Iraq within 12 months. More than 37 percent said U.S. forces should stay as long as they’re needed. Only 9 percent of Marines thought there should be an immediate pullout.
— -
© 2006, Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/13984338.htm
Forum posts
2 March 2006, 15:15
Mr. Ramsfeld is justifying the staying of his troops by the need to train Iraqi forces. I should remind you that the Iraqi army, which Mr. Bremer has dissolved, has war experience of more than 10 years. It lacks no training but now it lacks equipments, airplanes, and armors which has been destroyed by the invasion of Iraq. The USA troops are insisting on depriving this army from having such facilities. The new Iraqi army is using ordinary civilians cars for its military missions !. This army is allowed to use light Kalashnikov machine gun and nothing else. It has been deprived from the use of the simplest helicopters !. Yet the USA generals are telling you that they are BUILDING a new army. The Kurdish militia in north part of Iraq are very much well equipped in comparison with the NEW Iraqi army !.
The other reason for the troops stay in Iraq is the alleged war against Al-Qaida. If it is a war against Al-Qaida, then why it is done in Iraq and why the Iraqis are put as a fuel for this war?. Al-Qaida was not in Iraq before the USA troops came to Iraq. They came to Iraq to fight USA troops, and the Iraqis found themselves at the center of the battle .
A time table of withdrawing USA troops will certainly reduce the escalating violence in Iraq and it will save more lives of USA troops. Is it enough that more than 200,000 Iraqis and 2296 USA troops have been killed ? those who were injured are 10 times larger ! . All that was caused by Mr Bush and his advisors policies in Iraq.
I call every kind man in USA and Iraq to start to think how to end this massacre.
Mohammed Younis
Mosul / IRAQ.
2 March 2006, 20:37
The U.S. will never leave Iraq. Who in the leadership cares what the troops think.
It won’t matter who is in the Whitehouse or Congress. All future administrations will continue this policy. People who think it matters what they say to the U.S. leadership are just fools.
This policy has been in effect long before Bush came on the scene and it will be here long after he leaves.
The U.S. will stay even long after the oil runs out. Long after.
The one possibility is that future generations of Iraqis somehow defeat the U.S. (at the end of its Empire days,) and maybe then. But otherwise there is nothing to look forward for other nations, other than to be slaughtered by American forces.