Home > Who bombed the shrines?-The perfect controlled demolition.

Who bombed the shrines?-The perfect controlled demolition.

by Open-Publishing - Monday 27 February 2006
5 comments

International Attack-Terrorism

Take a good look at the picture above because I will tell you what I see.

I see a damaged dome caused by an explosion set very professionally that the two minarets from the both sides weren’t effected by the explosion.

Not even one single "gold plate" fall down from the minarets while the explosion was so heavy that caused the collapse of the dome.

Tell me, Is this work of few terrorists who wants to finish the job as fast as possible?

The one who did this, entered the mosque comfortably carrying explosions, he had all the time to study the construction of the building and find the perfect angles to set the explosions in a way that only the dome will be destroyed.

This is a professional, controlled demolition and the bombs set by demolition experts.

Attwar, the TV Anchor

Now, let’s talk about the death of the three Iraqi journalists.

TV anchor Attwar, age 26 years is a significant young woman born in Samarra, moved to Baghdad just 3-4 years ago, Attwar worked for Al-Jazeera first and then she moved to Al-Arbyia.

I am not writing Attwar’s autobiography here but this has connection to the events, Attwar (I think you are smart enough to know that she is a Sunni) was well-known of her support for the Iraqi cause and blaming the occupation for the mess in Iraq.

One ex-Abu Ghraib prisoner tells this story about Attwar:

When I came out through the gates of Abu-Ghraib there was TV team waiting outside asked me for an interview, I said yes, then came TV anchor Attwar and asked "How do you fell no.... "she couldn’t finish her question because she burst in tears when she saw how do I look like, bare feet, torn clothes....

This is an example of Attwar mentality.

What the media didn’t told on Attwar’s death is this:

Attwar and her other two colleagues found dead but the TV team was four members, bad news four the US but one of the team survived the assassination to tell this:

Attwar being born in Samarra, her relatives and friends are still there, she managed to interview eyewitnesses on the explosion and people live in the area around the mosque.

Notice, they found the TV-team’s bodies later but didn’t found the documentary she made,

Who benefit from killing Atwwar, Sunnis? She is a Sunni. Resistance? She sympathise with the resistance. Shiite riot? Samarra is dominated by Sunnis.

The answer is simple, Attwar killed because she knew "too much".

Zalamy Khalilzad weird message.

Sunni Clerical Association of Muslim Scholars, issued a 4 points condemnation letter to the bombing of shrine in Samara, You can see a picture of the letter here (Arabic), I don’t want go translating the whole letter but point 2 in the letter is a very important point.

It says the following:

We were suspicious when the US ambassador in Iraq (Zalamy Khalil) said: "A sectarian government who run their own ethnical militias to be incharge of the security (in Iraq) will not be acceptable", such announcement should be addressed in secret meetings and not through "Satellite TV channels", such public announcement will rally and moblize the shiia supporters of the "list 555" (Shiite alliance party).

SCAS are right, Zalamy Khalilzad announcement in public was meant to hit two birds in one stone, first an advertisement to the world that the US wants a united Iraq (for the public consumption only), second and the mean reason is he wanted to remind the Iraq alliances Shiites that they still under the US control.

Worth to notice that all news agancies wrote Khalilzad announcment as: During a rare news conference, Khalilzad....example

Shiite alliances didn’t understand the seriousness of Zalamy Khalil and they condemned "Khalilzad" announcement (Hakim, Jaffri..etc), several times they repeated that Iraq can make it’s own decisions and we don’t want an interfering in Iraqi matters from any external power, one Iraqi official said:

"Zalmay Khalil went too far with his demands"

Was the mosque explosion a continuation in the US and Shiite "dialog" but this time the US uses a "harsher language"?.

By the way today the so called Al-Qaeda in Iraq condemned the bombing, Baath party condemned the bombing and many fractions of Iraqi resistance condemned it also.
http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=726

Forum posts

  • Former CIA Analyst: Western Intelligence May Be Behind Mosque Bombing
    Prison Planet

    February26 ,2006

    Ray Mcgovern says US in most danger ever, from its own government

    Prison Planet | February2006 26

    Former CIA analyst a and presidential advisor Ray McGovern does not rule out Western involvement in this week’s Askariya mosque bombing in light of previous false flag operations that have advanced hidden agendas of the ruling elite.

    During the mid-eighties, McGovern was one of the senior analysts conducting early morning briefings of the PDB one-on-one with the Vice President, the Secretaries of State and Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.

    He joined Alex Jones to discuss many topics from martial law to government false flag terrorism and provocation tactics.

    McGovern firstly suggested that Posse Comitatus, the law that forbids the military to take on a policing role within the US, is being systematically overthrown.

    "Not only have the top ranks of the intelligence community been politicized and corrupted, so has the army. The military establishment is goose stepping around, saluting the President and saying whatever the President wants them to."

    A former officer himself, McGovern declared that the unprecedented movement towards a martial law mentality within government and military is a deeply unsettling one and that the US is hurtling toward a dictatorship.

    "As I look at the top Pentagon brass, I have to conclude that unlike my days as a US army officer, those folks have been so politicized that if the US President told them to go ahead and exercise police functions in this country they would go ahead and salute and they would do it, and that’s really scary."

    Moving on to the "war on terror", 27 year veteran McGovern concurred that staged terror has long been used by our governments in order to forward their own agendas at home and elsewhere:

    "There’s lots of evidence that the government in the past has used these things for its own purposes, for overthrowing governments, as it did in Iran in1953 , and in Guatemala in1954 , the Gulf of Tonkin was a little different...LBJ did deceive Congress and the war went on for seven years."

    Concerning9 / 11McGovern declared that although he is still in two minds, he is deeply suspicious of the official version of events and "there is certainly a cover up." The amount of unanswered questions and blatant lies told by Cheney and the NeoCons makes it very easy for him to believe the government was involved.

    Moving on to the recent Askariya mosque bombing in Samarra, Iraq McGovern commented;

    "The main question is Qui Bono? Who benefits from this kind of thing? You don’t have to be very conspiratorial or even paranoid to suggest that there are a whole bunch of likely suspects out there and not only the Sunnis. You know, the British officers were arrested, dressed up in Arab garb, riding around in a car, so this stuff goes on."

    Ray McGovern is part of a collective of former Intelligence officers who call themselves Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). Their writing can be found on www.truthout.com

    Prison Planet.tv subscribers look out for the full interview to be posted soon.

    http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m21044&l=i&size=1&hd= 0

    • The US wouldn’t bomb that mosque. They don’t want to be kept in iraq, they want to get the hell out of there. While the US should have never invaded in the first place, they do not want to incite more violence in Iraq. What would they gain?

      The article refuses to talk about why the US critizied a sectarian government, that is in response to the very sad death squad killings carried out by the new Iraqi security forces.

      Make no mistake Saddam killed thousands of his own people, but perhaps a man like that was necessary for ruling such a deeply divided country. We now see that even with some sort of elected officials, there is civil war in Iraq, which the US would not want.

      Why would they?

    • May be USA want’s to move out, but that is not what Israel has planned for U.S..
      It is them who doing weird things. 9/11 was a Mossad Job!!! Soon there will be proof.
      In that case will the American public finally abandone Israel?

    • It’s not America that wants to stay, it’s the neocons and the Bushites. They simply ignore what Americans want, as long as it brings them a profit (money, power, or territory).

    • The US wants to pull out??? ur kidding man... if they really want, they can immediatly pull out... after all, Iraq is not their country, and the US is not responsible of what is not theirs... and why did they come in the first place if they want to pull out now?? Was it for the WMD?? There was none, and the CIA knew that... For saddam?? With no WMD, saddam is not more dangerous than a piece of cake...

      It’s obvious that they came for the oil.... and for other economic reasons (Halliburton and all the companeis that got a contract there)... so it’s all about money, and as long they are gaining money (and allowing the Mossad to infiltrate iraq) they will stay there..

      Tip of the day: USA is a capitalist country...