Home > Rep. Smith back from Iraq "most troops now say they want to come home"

Rep. Smith back from Iraq "most troops now say they want to come home"

by Open-Publishing - Tuesday 6 December 2005
3 comments

Wars and conflicts Parties USA

Rep. Smith says vote in favor of war a mistake

By MATTHEW DALY
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

WASHINGTON — Just back from Iraq, Rep. Adam Smith says he is encouraged by the progress U.S. troops are making there. But Smith, one of two House Democrats from Washington state to vote in favor of the war, said Friday if he had to do it over, he would change his vote.

"I wanted to give our commander in chief a certain amount of trust," Smith said of his October 2002 vote authorizing President Bush to use force in Iraq.

"I decided we are at war, Saddam needs to be held accountable and I will trust the president," Smith told The Associated Press. "I feel like that trust turned out to be misplaced. If I had to do it all over again, I would not give it to him for that reason."

Smith’s comments came a week after Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Wash., who also voted in favor of the war, said he now believes the war was a mistake.

A longtime defense hawk, Dicks said last week he believes the prewar intelligence was "doctored" and that the White House did not prepare for or deploy enough troops for the insurgency that’s unfolded. He said he would "absolutely not" have voted for the war if he knew there were no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, as the administration claimed.

Smith, who returned Thursday from a five-day trip to Iraq and three other countries, said Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other officials should be held accountable for overstating the case for war and the presence of catastrophic weapons.

But he stopped short of saying that anyone in the administration lied. "They showed a reckless disregard for the truth as they made the case," Smith said in a telephone interview from his home in Tacoma.

Even so, Smith said he disagrees with critics who call the war effort a failure.

"In the last year, there’s been significant progress on ... security, nation-building and transitioning to Iraqi control. It’s a shame that we weren’t prepared for it in the first place, but (U.S. troops) are making up for it and doing their best," he said.

A member of the House Armed Services and International Relations committees, Smith was in Iraq Monday and Tuesday, along with five other House members from both parties. The delegation also spent time in Kuwait, Germany and the Netherlands.

Smith met several times with small groups of soldiers from Washington state and elsewhere during his time in Iraq.

While morale is good, most troops now say they want to come home, Smith said - a sharp contrast to his last Iraq visit in June 2004.

"They believe in what they are doing and what they have done, and believe they have made a difference, in terms of security and a civil society," Smith said. "But the second part of that is they are ready to go home."

Like Dicks, Smith said he doesn’t agree with Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., who has called for troops to leave Iraq in six months.

But Smith said he supports a plan by Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., who said Monday that "measurable progress" must be made in the next six months on political, reconstruction and security fronts. Biden called for a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops, so that by the end of 2006 there are less than half the 160,000 troops now in Iraq.

"Our goal should be an autonomous Iraqi government that is sustainable and legitimate," starting with the Dec. 15 parliamentary elections, Smith said. "Part of that is us getting out of there so they are not perceived as a puppet regime."

Just as important as U.S. actions is how they are framed by the administration and Congress, Smith said, adding that one of his biggest concerns about Murtha’s highly publicized call for withdrawal is that it comes from a sense that Iraq has descended into chaos "and we need to get the hell out of there."

"I don’t think that’s true, first of all," Smith said. "And second, it’s a major foreign policy mistake if we portray it that way."

Under those terms, al-Qaida and other insurgents can say they’ve won - that they drove the United States out of Iraq, which would only encourage terrorism around the world, Smith said.

Instead, the United States should portray its actions in a positive light, Smith said: "We want to withdraw. We took Saddam out and put in place a better government, and we are leaving because we are not occupiers. That’s a better message."
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420AP_WA_Smith_Iraq.html

Forum posts

  • And the American people and politicians have totally taken for granted our military and their families.

    The hardships are real-thanks for nothing-now get our people home from the place they should have NEVER been-be sure to write the Iraqis a nice check on the way out. Not that it will help much.

    Republicans should be ashamed of themselves-Christmas is coming, give freely to those in need. It is the very least you can do if you supported this war. Most of us with good sense, knew Bush was lying from the beginning.

  • Let me dissect Rep. Smith’s comments line by line: ’Our goal is an autonomous Iraqi government that is sustainable and legitimate".
    How is occupying a sovereign country going to acheive this goal? Occupying a country implies only one thing, the installment of a puppet regime. Mr. Smith uses the English language much like any other neocon, obfuscation after obfuscation, generalization after generalization, lie after lie. An autonomous Iraqi government, my effin’ ass. An autonomous Iraqi government will necessarily be a radical Islamic one, heavily Shiite, with closer ties to Iran than ever before, something that would spell disaster to the neocons’ long range plans for total domination of the Middle East. What Mr. Smith is really saying: ’Our goal is to install a permanent puppet regime that will bend over when ever we ask it too, and will sell us their oil at basement prices".
    When asked to comment on Rep. Murtha’s statement that Iraq has descended into chaos, Smith asserts that "I don’t think that’s true".
    In other words, Mr. Smith doesn’t believe that Iraq has descended into chaos. Where was this bozo all this time he spent in Iraq, at the Baghdad Ramada Inn? Did he hide in the hotel lobby his entire trip? The man is either a liar, a paid goon or one of the legions of brainwashed automatons we call the Republican Party.
    Mr. Smith thinks it would be a major policy mistake if we were to withdraw now. This war was a disastrous mistake, so how can an illegal occupation be considered good policy? Mr. Smith’s statements offer us more evidence that our political leaders have the reasoning ability of insects, of ants; just follow what the queen transmits to you and every thing will be honky dory. We need independent thinkers in Congress, not bozos, not ants, not automatons.
    Mr. Smith says that if we were to leave now, the terrorists will claim that they won. There is a great deal of utter bullshit to this statement. First of all, it was Al-Queda that is our enemy, not the Iraqi insurgents, who our only rebeling against a superpower that has killed tens of thousands of their people. This invasion and occupation of Iraq has created vast legions of insurgents, the vast majority of which are Iraqis, and who are truly autonomous, with very little guidance from Al-Queda, Bush’s favorite scape goat, a scape goat that he failed to capture in the first place. The neocons have no one else to blame but themselves since this invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation caused this current rise of both terrorism in the Middle East and caused the growing insurgency to come into being. Mr. Smith is all about damage control, and very weak damage control I might add.

  • I PERSONALLY WILL NOT SUPPORT ANY POLITICIAN WHO FEELS WE SHOULD HAVE A GRADUAL REDUCTION OF TROOPS. WE MUST GET OUT NOW. IF YOU BELIEVE THE WAR WAS SOLD ON LIES, AND LOGIC SAYS IT IS THUS AN ILLEGAL WAR, FOLLOW THIS ANALOGY-

    IF A BURGLAR ENTERS YOUR HOME, AND YOU CATCH HIM IN THE MIDDLE OF HIS CRIMES, DO YOU JUST LET HIM FINISH OUT HIS INTENDED CRIME?

    IF THE WAR IS ILLEGAL WE SHOULD GET OUT TOMORROW!!!